Regenerate test results
Improve warning message for `INT_AS_ENUM_WITHOUT_CAST`
Improve `REDUNDANT_AWAIT` message and regenerate tests
Allow warning message for UNASSIGNED_VARIABLE_OP_ASSIGN to display specific operator
Remove "being" from some messages to make them consistent and clearer
Update expected test results
Use Variant::get_operator_name for determining string representation of operator instead of big switch-case
Update tests
Update modules/gdscript/gdscript_warning.cpp
Co-authored-by: Danil Alexeev <dalexeev12@yandex.ru>
Update tests... again
This fixes a bug in the analyzer where it did not push the SHADOWED_VARIABLE_BASE_CLASS
warning for members shadowed by variable in subclass. It does this by comparing the class
which contains the shadowed member with the class containing the variable, and pushing
SHADOWED_VARIABLE only if the classes are the same. Additionally, SHADOWED_VARIABLE_BASE_CLASS
can take an extra symbol which helps to specify the line for non native base class.
If the type of a variable is a built-in Variant type, then it will
automatically be assigned a default value based on the type. This means
that the explicit initialization may be unnecessary. Thus this commit
removes the warning in such case.
This also changes the meaning of the unassigned warning to happen when
the variable is used before being assigned, not when it has zero
assignments.
If the left value type is known to be String, assume the format operator
(`%`) will return a string, since it works with any type in the right
hand side. This is also used by type inference even if the right hand
type is unknown at compile time.
These errors are very common when using an invalid property name
or calling on an object of the wrong type, and the previous message
was a bit cryptic for users.
Co-authored-by: Rémi Verschelde <rverschelde@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: golfinq <golfinqz@gmail.com>
Within a match statement, it is now possible to add guards in each
branch:
var a = 0
match a:
0 when false: print("does not run")
0 when true: print("but this does")
This allows more complex logic for deciding which branch to take.
